The 2022 National Defense Authorization Act

The language currently proposed in the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act, which is pending a vote, raises crucial questions and opens doors for greater transparency and research into UAP.

Numerous representatives in both the House and Senate have expressed keen interest in acquiring cutting-edge UAP technologies, with several even drafting legislation aimed at uncovering the truth.

From the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act, subparagraph (I) states:

• REQUIREMENT: By October 31, 2022, and annually thereafter until October 31, 2026, the Secretary, in collaboration with the Director, must deliver a report on unidentified aerial phenomena to the relevant Congressional committees.
• ELEMENTS: Each report must include, for the year in question, the following data:
  1. An update on any efforts to capture or utilize identified unidentified aerial phenomena.

This wording could suggest that Congress suspects U.S. adversaries have surpassed the U.S. in possessing advanced strike capabilities, marking a significant intelligence failure in American history. This might explain the sudden surge in interest regarding UAP.

If this is indeed the case, it raises eyebrows as to why the U.S. has never faced an attack from any global adversary wielding such superior technology.

Lawmakers are also cognizant that this technology does not originate from American sources. As reported by The New York Times, unnamed Washington officials stated before the UAP Task Force's preliminary report was released:

> "...UAP incidents documented over the past two decades did not originate from any American military or other advanced U.S. government technology..."

This clarification rules out the possibility that Navy pilots who observed unexplainable vehicles encountered secret government programs.

In a recent article from The New York Times, titled "Pentagon Forms a Group to Examine Unexplained Aerial Sightings," it was also noted:

> "Government officials said privately that there was no evidence of Russian or Chinese advanced technology in use, much less space-traveling aliens, in the information collected."

It appears that UAP are neither of American nor adversarial origin. Though officials indicate a lack of evidence for space-faring aliens, we may be running out of suspects.

Nevertheless, it’s plausible that Congress is aware of exotic materials and vehicles stored away with government contractors.

The now-disbanded Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) was established within the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence to standardize the collection and reporting of UAP sightings.

The Lue Elizondo Factor

The predecessor to the UAPTF was the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) led by Lue Elizondo.

In recent interviews, Elizondo has revealed that he maintains contacts within the Pentagon and has discussed matters with the now-disbanded UAP task force director during the drafting of the UAPTF report.

It is assumed that all data gathered by AATIP regarding UAP would be included in the classified version of the UAP Task Force report. Speculation has arisen that Elizondo contributed to compiling the classified report for Congress, though this remains unconfirmed.

During an interview last spring, Elizondo was questioned about whether he had approached Lockheed Martin regarding their possession of exotic assets.

> "Have we asked? Yes, I won’t disclose the answer because it requires approval from certain organizations and military contractors, and I'm not authorized to speak on their behalf."

Elizondo seems to be on a mission for the truth these days. At times, even he is unsatisfied with his ambiguous responses and feels compelled to go a bit further.

> "I've made it abundantly clear that I believe the U.S. government possesses exotic material. I stand by that statement."

It appears that Elizondo, a knowledgeable figure in the field with credible sources, believes the U.S. has access to crash debris. This notion alone should make for some intriguing conversation at the Thanksgiving table.

If AATIP was aware of government contractors in possession of exotic materials, it would likely be addressed in the classified UAPTF report.

Additionally, this isn’t the first time Congress has been briefed on studies concerning UFO crash site recoveries.

The Dr. Eric Davis Factor

Dr. Eric Davis has spent years consulting for the Pentagon's UFO program and is now a defense contractor with the Aerospace Corporation.

Davis provided a classified briefing to congressional intelligence committees on what he referred to as “off-world vehicles not made on this earth," essentially discussing spaceships, as highlighted by The New York Times.

Ralph Blumenthal, while appearing on Jimmy Church’s Fade to Black, explained the inclusion of Davis's quote in the New York Times article, "No Longer in Shadows, Pentagon’s U.F.O. Unit Will Make Some Findings Public":

> "Eric Davis, among others, briefed congressional committees with slides 'which we received' on material recovery."

> "What we can confirm is that this information was indeed part of briefings and was referenced in slides presented to high-level congressional committees. Anything we publish in the New York Times must be vetted and clearly delineate what we're stating versus speculation, backed by our findings and those of our editors."

Evidently, Dr. Davis's role was to update Congressional intelligence members on advancements in reverse-engineering UFOs, which raises fascinating questions about any successes and technological challenges.

It seems that some Congressional members on intelligence committees have long been aware that the U.S. possesses exotic materials and vehicles. This update clarifies two key points:

• Neither the U.S. nor its adversaries are currently utilizing this advanced technology.
• Mastery and exploitation of this technology are crucial for the national security of democracies worldwide.

The question remains: how far is Congress willing to go to uncover the mysteries surrounding this technology?

Shoot Them Down?

While this notion may seem outrageous, it's worth considering whether the U.S. and other nations are attempting to shoot down UFOs.

It would be morally indefensible to attack a previously peaceful entity without cause, especially given their possession of superior technology. Any attack could provoke a justified retaliatory strike, potentially leading to catastrophic outcomes.

The stakes are high, and the preservation of democracy may hinge on acquiring this technology first.

Could Congress endorse capturing an alien craft in an effort to outmaneuver its adversaries in discovering this technology?

Or is it feasible that solving this technological riddle requires additional pieces of the puzzle?

The Ultimate Gamble

In a previous article titled "This Is Not Science Fiction," Ross Coulthart mentioned on a podcast that his sources indicated there has been contemplation of offensively attempting to bring down these objects.

In a recent interview with Coulthart on "That UFO Podcast," he elaborated on information relayed to him by former U.S. SCI communications officer, Bob Fish, as outlined in his book "In Plain Sight."

Fish recounted that frequencies were detected at least 40 years ago emanating from UAP entering Earth's atmosphere, moving in and out of the Atlantic Ocean near Florida's east coast, presumably in the Bermuda Triangle.

In a segment from That UFO Podcast on September 21, 2021, Coulthart discussed U.S. attempts to shoot down UFOs:

> "Scientists, technicians, and military sources have informed me that not only has the U.S. engaged in this, but it continues to do so. We are also monitoring these objects in space, and I have been told by an unnamed source that the U.S. is exploring the possibility—perhaps has already attempted—using frequencies to bring these objects down. Essentially, it’s an offensive strategy against one of these objects to deploy electromagnetic frequencies to neutralize them... I sincerely hope that's not the case."

Presumably, this frequency allows the U.S. military to detect, track, and anticipate UAP movements.

While Fish's observations date back to the 1970s, some suggest that such frequencies were recognized as far back as 1960. James McDonald discovered that UFOs emitted radio signals oscillating between 2995 to 3000 MHz at a frequency of 600 Hz.

It is not beyond belief that a UFO was brought down years ago, either accidentally or intentionally. A non-hostile alien civilization provoked without cause might decide to respond in kind.

That warning could manifest as a visit to nuclear facilities, either deactivating or activating nuclear warheads.

While this topic may be a lot to digest at the Thanksgiving table alongside gravy and cranberry sauce, if framed in an engaging manner, it could provide everyone with something to ponder, reminding them that life continues and we are still here.